Skip to main content

What You Identify With Might Be Holding You Back

Today I discuss why some of us feel like we can never get better, how it is actually our fault, and what we could start to do about it try to make things better.
_

As was common for most students my age then who were at the stage of our lives where we were at the start of trying to figure things out, I had found myself stuck in a cycle of self-inflicted misery. Today, I feel much better than before, and feel like I have become a better person.

I come to realize that one of the key things holding back our progress is our idea of identity.

Identity is what defines us. It is what we characterize ourselves as. Thus, it may be possible that we identify ourselves with negative attributes. 

This becomes a problem because becoming better can be seen as making ourselves “not ourselves anymore”; By identifying ourselves with a negative attribute, we are making counterproductive efforts to get rid of that attribute and become better, because every improvement is seen as us “losing ourselves”, forgetting that we are ourselves to define.

Should we identify ourselves to be negative individuals with negative thoughts and negative value, this becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy and vicious cycle, reinforcing to ourselves the notion that we are of negative value; We impose upon ourselves a self-inflicted "barrier of misery", and though we might be inclined to blame the world and our external circumstances, it is in actuality ourselves that are holding us back from changing for the better.

Understanding this, how might we act to improve the aforementioned situations to better attain personal growth?

I have two suggestions. 

A problem well stated is a problem half-solved. Thus, we must first acknowledge and recognize our current identity. From personal experience, by journaling or writing reflections, one can essentially "capture" who we were before. This solves the "identity crisis" by helping us to not feel like “we are losing ourselves” by becoming better, as we now have an “archive” or who we were, to be able to look back in the future to see growth in retrospect. By being honest with ourselves in documenting our reflections, this frees us to rebuild our identities without the irrational fear of “forgetting who we were before” (since we “weren't always this way”).

Next, we should begin to peg our identity to a positive attribute instead. This would allow us to reidentify and redefine ourselves against our strengths instead of weaknesses that further allow for their development. This change of mindset is the first but important step in working toward becoming who we want to be and to start to be proud of our identity and character.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Principles I-V

"When we open our mouths to describe what we see, we in effect describe ourselves, our perceptions, our paradigms[...] Where we stand depends on where we sit." - Stephen R. Covey _ Recently I've been asked if I could write an advice column for those of my demographic in similar contexts. I'm not sure I've really figured it out myself. In line with my personal guiding 2022 Theme "Year of Novelty" and Mission "Return Better Than You Left", I have been exploring and expanding my domains of social interaction, community volunteering, life fulfillment, and continuous journaling. However, I suddenly realise that I'm not sure if these developments are better — or merely just different , especially since these are externally-centred and hence may be unsustainable sources of meaning. Even in psychologically safe environments, there may be psychologically unsafe moments. It would benefit us to shift our mental model from the dependence on external va...
Post a Comment
Read more

Reviewed: The PSC Scholarship

The PSC Scholarship Scores of tourists throng the streets about this urban cafe in the heart of Tiong Bahru. Seated across from me is a colleague from one of the year-long projects that we have just completed. Two ice-cream waffles separate us on marble-esque plates. There was finally some time to sit down and catch up. As I recall it there wasn’t a missing beat in our conversation. She led mostly about our personal lives, dreams, intentions and plans. We chatted for a bit over the 90 minutes that we had between schedules. I had always known intellectually that we live very different lives, but I did not imagine the great extent to which this is true. She shares of adventurous climes in overseas travels (and missing our local food while abroad), studying a fourth language, exploring a part-time job, applying for internship, writing original songs, taking guitar lessons, chairing a student conference, and training for badminton up to four times a week at the community club. Some people ...
Post a Comment
Read more

An alternative policy suggestion to menstrual leave, contextualised to Singapore

I came across this on my LinkedIn feed today. LinkedIn is no Reddit, but the comments seem largely supportive. In principle, I am fully in favour of the "health and wellness first" approach to employee management. It hurts to see my sister being expected to periodically feign optimal performance whilst being essentially functionally incapacitated. Therefore, by the standard of only this metric, a "2-day menstrual leave policy" (hereafter, "MLP") may sound like a good idea. However, since equity and equality are necessarily dichotomous, it may be possible that these distinctions engendered by such "progressive" policies may conversely entrench the very attitudes that they seek to dispel. This may be a problem because the pursuit of equity undermines the equality of opportunity, if employers with productivity-maximising objectives must decide between "menstruating people [sic]" and not, ceteris paribus. It won't be difficult to see h...
Post a Comment
Read more