Skip to main content

Reviewed: The 10-point Rating System


The 10-point Rating System

In The Anthropocene Reviewed by John Green, Green writes his thoughts on the format of the review: “Booklist reviews were limited to 175 words, which meant each sentence must work multiple jobs. Every review had to introduce a book while also analysing it. Your compliments needed to live right alongside your concerns”. 

In many ways, this is what I attempt to do here– except that we get a slightly more generous 2200 characters on Instagram, which converts to about 400 words.

Recently, in my capacity as a resource panel member, I’d had the opportunity to review and user-test some new toolkits on designing ground-up projects for public health. After about an hour of giving our opinions on the various aspects, we were asked to offer a rating out of 10.

The 10-point rating scale doesn’t exist for humans; it exists for data aggregation systems. Everyone's experience is different and thus fundamentally incommensurable. But it is almost impossible to quantify experiences, and so we settle for lesser measures like ratings.

There were about five of us in the call. Some ratings were given as “7.5” or “8.5”. I offered a “7”.

Another common rating measure is the 5-star scale. My view is that the only way to make these two systems interoperable, is that the 10-point system must thus disallow decimal points. 

My error was in applying the mental shortcut that 5 is the midpoint grade of 10. On a 5-star scale, I realise that because 0 is not an option and 5 is the maximum rating, the midpoint is actually 3 and not 2.5. This is consistent with what we perceive as “Neutral”. I would have given 4 stars in this case, which rightfully translates to 8-points. I note this for the future, that I could sooner grade on a five-star scale, and then convert it up.

I followed up with an email affirming the team on the effort and research done to develop such a resource from the ground up, which is a tall order.

Green continues: “[W]hen people write reviews, they are really writing a kind of memoir– here’s what my experience was eating at this restaurant or getting my hair cut at this barbershop”. 

I give the 10-point rating system two and a half stars.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Principles I-V

"When we open our mouths to describe what we see, we in effect describe ourselves, our perceptions, our paradigms[...] Where we stand depends on where we sit." - Stephen R. Covey _ Recently I've been asked if I could write an advice column for those of my demographic in similar contexts. I'm not sure I've really figured it out myself. In line with my personal guiding 2022 Theme "Year of Novelty" and Mission "Return Better Than You Left", I have been exploring and expanding my domains of social interaction, community volunteering, life fulfillment, and continuous journaling. However, I suddenly realise that I'm not sure if these developments are better — or merely just different , especially since these are externally-centred and hence may be unsustainable sources of meaning. Even in psychologically safe environments, there may be psychologically unsafe moments. It would benefit us to shift our mental model from the dependence on external va...

Deconstructing FOMO

Clarification: This is an opinion piece and not a factually researched article. Definitions and lines of reasoning presented herein are largely my own. _ FOMO /ˈfəʊməʊ/ noun  anxiety that an exciting or interesting event may currently be happening elsewhere, often aroused by posts seen on social media. _ FOMO, the Fear Of Missing Out, refers to the knowledge that an exciting or interesting event may currently be happening not involving one but involving one's counterparts that leads to an anxiety or fear of being deprived of the positive experiences that said counterparts or peers are encountering in the given moment. It is one of those weird phrases that has only entered the common lexicon in recent times, and not only already seems dated, but also has an implied negative connotation. However, perhaps the aforementioned criteria are not enough to fully define the circumstances in which FOMO manifests itself. To illustrate, if a gazillionare builds a fleet of automated humanoid dro...

The mental health conundrum, briefly

According to an article published on 4 August 2020, the Samaritans of Singapore (SOS) reports that suicide remains the leading cause of death among people aged 10-29 in Singapore, adding that the number of suicides among the 20-29 age cohort remain the highest compared to other age groups.  You know we live in a first world country when the leading cause of death for your youth is suicides and not preventable infectious diseases. Credit where due, every school in Singapore today has a full-time school counselor. In fact, our school had three counselors at the start of this year, two of whom were here on a contractual basis whose duration of commitment have since elapsed and they are no longer attached to our school.  Recently we had a mental health wellness seminar for a CCE (Character and Citizenship Education) lesson in school, wherein the speaker shared with us statistics and studies regarding the importance of sleep or having a balanced diet. In addition, we were introduce...