Skip to main content

Reviewed: The 10-point Rating System


The 10-point Rating System

In The Anthropocene Reviewed by John Green, Green writes his thoughts on the format of the review: “Booklist reviews were limited to 175 words, which meant each sentence must work multiple jobs. Every review had to introduce a book while also analysing it. Your compliments needed to live right alongside your concerns”. 

In many ways, this is what I attempt to do here– except that we get a slightly more generous 2200 characters on Instagram, which converts to about 400 words.

Recently, in my capacity as a resource panel member, I’d had the opportunity to review and user-test some new toolkits on designing ground-up projects for public health. After about an hour of giving our opinions on the various aspects, we were asked to offer a rating out of 10.

The 10-point rating scale doesn’t exist for humans; it exists for data aggregation systems. Everyone's experience is different and thus fundamentally incommensurable. But it is almost impossible to quantify experiences, and so we settle for lesser measures like ratings.

There were about five of us in the call. Some ratings were given as “7.5” or “8.5”. I offered a “7”.

Another common rating measure is the 5-star scale. My view is that the only way to make these two systems interoperable, is that the 10-point system must thus disallow decimal points. 

My error was in applying the mental shortcut that 5 is the midpoint grade of 10. On a 5-star scale, I realise that because 0 is not an option and 5 is the maximum rating, the midpoint is actually 3 and not 2.5. This is consistent with what we perceive as “Neutral”. I would have given 4 stars in this case, which rightfully translates to 8-points. I note this for the future, that I could sooner grade on a five-star scale, and then convert it up.

I followed up with an email affirming the team on the effort and research done to develop such a resource from the ground up, which is a tall order.

Green continues: “[W]hen people write reviews, they are really writing a kind of memoir– here’s what my experience was eating at this restaurant or getting my hair cut at this barbershop”. 

I give the 10-point rating system two and a half stars.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Principles I-V

"When we open our mouths to describe what we see, we in effect describe ourselves, our perceptions, our paradigms[...] Where we stand depends on where we sit." - Stephen R. Covey _ Recently I've been asked if I could write an advice column for those of my demographic in similar contexts. I'm not sure I've really figured it out myself. In line with my personal guiding 2022 Theme "Year of Novelty" and Mission "Return Better Than You Left", I have been exploring and expanding my domains of social interaction, community volunteering, life fulfillment, and continuous journaling. However, I suddenly realise that I'm not sure if these developments are better — or merely just different , especially since these are externally-centred and hence may be unsustainable sources of meaning. Even in psychologically safe environments, there may be psychologically unsafe moments. It would benefit us to shift our mental model from the dependence on external va...

Reviewed: The PSC Scholarship

The PSC Scholarship Scores of tourists throng the streets about this urban cafe in the heart of Tiong Bahru. Seated across from me is a colleague from one of the year-long projects that we have just completed. Two ice-cream waffles separate us on marble-esque plates. There was finally some time to sit down and catch up. As I recall it there wasn’t a missing beat in our conversation. She led mostly about our personal lives, dreams, intentions and plans. We chatted for a bit over the 90 minutes that we had between schedules. I had always known intellectually that we live very different lives, but I did not imagine the great extent to which this is true. She shares of adventurous climes in overseas travels (and missing our local food while abroad), studying a fourth language, exploring a part-time job, applying for internship, writing original songs, taking guitar lessons, chairing a student conference, and training for badminton up to four times a week at the community club. Some people ...

An alternative policy suggestion to menstrual leave, contextualised to Singapore

I came across this on my LinkedIn feed today. LinkedIn is no Reddit, but the comments seem largely supportive. In principle, I am fully in favour of the "health and wellness first" approach to employee management. It hurts to see my sister being expected to periodically feign optimal performance whilst being essentially functionally incapacitated. Therefore, by the standard of only this metric, a "2-day menstrual leave policy" (hereafter, "MLP") may sound like a good idea. However, since equity and equality are necessarily dichotomous, it may be possible that these distinctions engendered by such "progressive" policies may conversely entrench the very attitudes that they seek to dispel. This may be a problem because the pursuit of equity undermines the equality of opportunity, if employers with productivity-maximising objectives must decide between "menstruating people [sic]" and not, ceteris paribus. It won't be difficult to see h...